Monday 26 March 2012

Dynamic intelligence


I’ve started providing RDI consultancy to a new family recently.  I find that every time I work with a new family, I either re-discover something about RDI or something is positively reinforced for me.  This time, it’s the difference in outcomes that can be achieved with static and dynamic intelligence. 

What’s dynamic intelligence I hear you ask – well it’s the opposite of what’s measured by IQ, which measures what we know…..how many facts we’ve accumulated and whether we can work out formulas and patterns.  Basically, academic learning.  Most schools have a primary focus on teaching academic learning, which is static by nature i.e. the facts and formulas don’t change.  Dynamic intelligence is about what we can do with what we know…..how we can use the information in our noggins to adapt in the moment to the ever-changing demands of the world. 

In typical development, kids are quickly motivated to take part in social interaction because of the emotional feedback they get from their parents.  Here is an example of two toddlers: a typically developing toddler receiving and responding to positive emotional feedback from her parents; and a toddler with autism whose development has been derailed by the autism. 

Some of you have seen this clip before in a different blogpost.  It’s a great clip in that it reveals so much about social interaction from different perspectives – let’s look at it now through the ‘dynamic intelligence’ lens.  The time codes we want to look at for this video are 2 mins to 6 mins.



The second toddler is unable to be soothed by the parent when something goes wrong – he starts to get mad and cry when the tower tumbles.  If we contrast this with the typically developing toddler, we see that she is able to take her mishap in her stride, re-placing the brick and echoing her Dad’s ‘uh oh!’

The first toddler is getting positive feedback from her parents and she is able to use it to help her stay on task and to keep regulated.  A crucial bit of feedback here is the Dad’s off-camera ‘uh oh!’…….a shorthand vocalisation of the thoughts ‘oh no – what a shame….never mind, it’ll be ok, you can try again!’  The emotional feedback loop between this child and her parents is working.  The child borrows Dad's thinking (conveyed in the vocalisation of 'uh oh!') to help keep herself from getting upset and frustrated when things go wrong.

The emotional feedback/thinking-sharing loop is not working between the second toddler and his parents.  It has been disrupted by the onset of autism.  Why do we need that emotional feedback loop?  Because it is right at the heart of child development.  It is Peter Hobson’s ‘Cradle of Thought’ – emotional feedback/thinking-sharing between child and caregiver enables the child to develop ‘dynamic intelligence’ (DI). 

With my new family, I asked parents to think about the differences between what can be achieved with static intelligence and what can be achieved with dynamic intelligence.  Here (with kind permission….for which, thanks) are their answers:

Skills and abilities that can be achieved through behavioural and academic programmes (developing static intelligence)

Improved IQ, speech and language and task focused / instrumental behaviours that can be taught through rehearsal, repetition and modelling. (As opposed to spontaneous, flexible and emotionally driven behaviour that is informed by the person’s dynamic intelligence).

Skills and abilities that can be achieved through RDI (developing dynamic intelligence)

Flexible thinking, problem solving, critical analysis, grey area thinking, good enough thinking, simultaneous processing and integration and assimilation, relational thinking, emotional regulation, self-evaluation / awareness, reflection, emotional resilience, empathy, seeing it from another's point of view, ... and so on.

Without the skills and abilities that can be achieved through RDI, you are very limited in what you can do with those skills that have been acquired through behavioural and academic programmes.

We also had a discussion about how dynamic intelligence helps to achieve good mental health and wellbeing.  Here are parents’ thoughts:

DI enables you to have meaningful interpersonal engagement with others. Having reciprocal relationships with family and friends, people to confide in as part of your network of support, is a protective factor against mental illness.

DI enables you to develop adaptive coping skills and strategies (manage uncertainty and change) and this is a protective factor against mental illness.

DI can enable you to engage and sustain purposeful activity and/or employment. This can foster a sense of independence, self-worth/improved self-esteem and this is another protective factor against mental illness.

Great responses, helping us to see very clearly that whilst we need both static and dynamic intelligence, dynamic intelligence ‘provides the tools to successfully solve complicated problems, prioritize multiple demands, carry on meaningful relationships and achieve long-term goals. Jobs, friendships, marriages and most aspects of daily life are primarily dynamic in nature.

I think this feedback from my parents sums it up: ‘Without the skills and abilities that can be achieved through RDI, you are very limited in what you can do with those skills that have been acquired through behavioural and academic programmes.’

RDI gives our kids another chance at developing dynamic intelligence – all those key competencies that are crucial for jobs, relationships and independence. 

To read more about dynamic intelligence, please follow this link:

Sunday 4 March 2012

Looking through a different lens


I have a new friend called Emily who I met on facebook a couple of weeks ago.  A week later we were on the phone and a week after that, making plans to meet in person.  You know when you just ‘click’ with someone?  Emily’s business provides consultancy to schools where there are vulnerable children who are struggling to learn and/or thrive in their educational setting.  The children she consults on may not have a diagnosis of any particular difficulty but they are clearly having problems fitting in and/or learning.  Her approach is based on Ross Greene’s work.  I have discussed Ross’ Collaborative Problem Solving in previous posts and we continue to use it very effectively both at home and at Bright Futures School.
Over to Emily for more about her business……..

My bio through my eyes

I am called Emily and I am a mother of two boys, one is 12 the other is 7. I am a qualified teacher and have worked within Mainstream and all styles of Special Needs provision in Early Years and Primary schools for the last 11 years.

I have a dream ........that one day I will be an educationalist and change the way we communicate with children in educational settings.  I also dream that I will conquer the world (well maybe a small town!) and provide the best education possible for children with any sort of challenging behaviour.  My passion and reason for being is to ensure my goal is achieved. I feel very strongly that my philosophy has no flaws if followed correctly.  I am ox-strong with it and I am now on my journey.   I have left teaching to start my pledge and have a new company called EncompassNow


Labels to me are pretty irrelevant (obviously we need them to get support, or at least that’s the myth).  If a child has any sort of difficulty they need that extra help and support to work through it and this needs to fit to the child not the expectation of how children should react dependent on a label.

 Children and people respond like us all to compassion, love and understanding. I will expand: if children feel love they offer it back, if children feel trust they give back trust, if they feel comfortable they feel free to try out new things and if they are not constantly being instructed they will eventually work things out for themselves and regulate their own environment.  Some children - about 10-15% find it difficult, well impossible, to regulate themselves and this is where the problems lie.  These children need help and support, they need to be taught how to regulate themselves and how to work things through that don’t go the way they ‘perceived’ they should.

I kind of don’t want to mention this as it is pretty obvious where my feelings lie but I guess I have to ...... aggression, punishment and bribery puts anyone’s backs up makes people suspicious and is never going to work. I will expand, shouting, putting down, sticker charts, detentions, being kept away from friends ..... it goes on and on.  These exacerbate already poor situations and encourage children to lose faith in a system that is rapidly letting them down.

I have read and read up on the subject, almost to exhaustion and eventually after reading a lot of nonsense and non-starters I came across a man called Ross Greene.  He is amazing.  He put my words into his mouth, mixed them up a bit made them sound ever so grand and popped them onto paper.  He says it all.  He has a philosophy that is above and beyond anything else I have ever come across.  “He gets it”, he understands, he realises how people really respond to each other and how the world should be communicating and I think he is the bees knees.


Ross Greene's web site is www.livesinthebalance.org

I have worked with children for years, many of them with additional needs and I know that my methods can help the children who find life that little bit more tricky than most.  The children I have taught have excelled, shown me immense respect and parents have flooded my doors with happy words and sounds of relief that at long last a teacher really understands their child.  I have been through four gruelling Ofsteds and been given ‘outstanding’ for every single observation.  When I was training to be a teacher many moons ago I remember being told that you must never  ask children if they would like to ..... you should always tell them.  My certainty started way back then as I knew at that moment deep within me, my empathic understanding was on a different playing field.

Teachers are in a tricky position, they are stressed and expected to meet targets which don’t really reflect anything but academic achievement.  More important to a person for their life- long achievement is to be happy and relaxed, confident and able and have an ability to work things through,  when under stress or alive with immense jubilation.  Once a person can do these things they will learn and they will excel, if they cannot do these things they get switched off and problems creep in.

Do parents really care whether their child is level 6 or can read all the high frequency words by the end of nursery? Maybe they do but not if their child is struggling.  They really don’t give a hoot, they want strategies built up, they want their child to be able to ask for help, express themselves in order to become independent and think for themselves, but also be able to function in a society where they have to conform.
As professionals it is always important to remember that it is ever so much more difficult for children to misbehave than conform.  Allowing children to work through emotions and building strategies with them enables them to work through ways in which to conform when needed.  We need to listen and listen hard to all the ways children communicate.  This can range from shouting something abusive to attempting to hit out at someone or even hiding under a table.  The way people behave demonstrate their discomforts or comforts and children are no different.  Children with heightened sensory awareness or an ability to feel emotions but not express them, may present in this way and these are the children that are crying out for help.

I have often had staff trouble shoot with me and ask my advice when having difficulties.  I have been told time and time again how good I am with the ‘difficult’ children (labelled by schools) and how on earth could I manage to get them to do certain things when other staff couldn’t.  The answer lies in the fact I never ever told them to do it.  I talk to children about what is difficult for them and we work out a solution together which is comfortable for both of us.  Here as an example of working within a mainstream classroom.  This below sounds so straightforward and obvious but many people would not even consider carrying it out.

Anxiety about whole school gatherings

Background

Whilst working in a year one class teaching a child that found whole school gatherings difficult.  He would become disruptive and loud, causing other children’s behaviour to escalate and make lining up very challenging. Over a short period of time I soon worked out that he wasn’t misbehaving to be difficult, he was doing it as he did not know what to expect and found transitions very tricky.

Solution

I was able to help him very easily by having a quiet word prior to us leaving the classroom about where we were going and what was going to happen.

Outcome

He was happy with this and we soon built up a strong trusting relationship.  .  This was a simple effective and manageable solution.  I always tried to ensure that plans remained the same as transition times were such a hurdle for him, if for any reason they changed at the last minute the trust was there and he began to calmly ask me what was happening.

My company offers a unique training package for educational settings.  I am offering to go into a setting and train staff for a day on empathic collaborative working and then spend several sessions with a class or individual child and their teacher modelling exactly how my practice should be carried out.  It is essential the staff at school are competent in this way of working in order to build up trust with their own pupils.
I hope that schools that have children who are struggling have the confidence to ask for help as it takes a much braver person to express your difficulties to others rather than struggling along helplessly.  Our spirited and special children surely prove this to us by their actions.

You can follow Emily Neal on twitter at @encompassnow

You can find encompassnow at www.encompassnow.co.uk

Great stuff – thanks Emily!  A much needed service for schools.  I like Emily's emphasis on the fact that often the first thing we need to do when considering how to support a child who is struggling is look through a different lens at what is happening for that child.  Too often, the child is labelled as ‘naughty’ or ‘oppositional’ when actually the behaviours we are seeing are either an expression of anxiety and inability to cope or a manifestation of the child’s needs not being met appropriately.

I'm looking forward to meeting up with Emily - first step, blog collaboration, next step....who knows?  The world is our lobster..........