Continuing our discussions about retained reflexes and overall development, here are some observations and questions from Deb and Nick related to the work they have been doing with their son through RDI and through the BIRD programme.
Hello
Your
discussions on the blog have been very interesting and have come at a time when
we have been trying to assimilate our thoughts on the relationship between
interventions to address retained reflexes, Sensory Integration Therapy and the
RDI approach.
In
October 2008 our son completed a course of sensory integration therapy. Through
this we learnt how different types and amounts of movements can stimulate his
different sensory systems and affect his level of functioning and behaviour in
a given situation. We came to better understand what types of movement and
sensation we need to 'feed' our son 'in
the moment' to help him with his sensory processing and integration to help him
in terms of his concentration /
attention, posture, physical regulation, gross and fine motor skills etc. We
see short lived improvements in these areas – enough to make a positive
difference so that he can more fully participate or be more competent in an
activity at that time - but this does not result in him being able to sustain
these improvements over time without further/ regular feeding.
In
April 2011 we commenced Reflexive Rehabilitation Development programme under
the direction of B.I.R.D. The initial assessment concluded that our son (who
was 7yrs 4 months at that time) had retained all of the primitive reflexes that
they test for i.e. babinski,
asymmetrical tonic neck reflex, spinal gallant and the symmetrical tonic neck
reflex. A year on, May 2012, at his latest assessment it was found that the
asymmetrical tonic neck reflex and the spinal gallant reflex are now inhibited
completely. The babinski reflex is residual in the left foot only, and we are
commencing new exercises to work on inhibiting the symmetrical tonic neck
reflex.
In
January 2012 we commenced RDI programme and have just completed the initial
education module.
Like
Kimberley we too have considered the importance of timing, and this has led us
to conclude that to get the best outcomes from an RDI approach, the work on
retained reflexes has to happen first or be happening, if at all possible,
doesn't it? And what about sensory
integration difficulties - exercises to
address these difficulties - they need
to be part and parcel of everyday life don't they.?
We
are wondering what the relationship is between retained reflexes and sensory
integration difficulties. They must be inextricably linked / interwoven. Can
you possibly have one without the other? We are assuming you can't, and that
work on retained reflexes and work on sensory integration difficulties have to
go together.
But
they are different aren't they? Why do
some therapists advocate sensory integration therapy and not do any work on
retained reflexes, and other therapists lead with work on the retained reflexes
and don't mention sensory integration therapy? How can this be?
Finally,
for now anyhow, do you think our sons sensory integration and processing will
improve and be more sustained, with the need for less 'feeding', once all his
retained reflexes have been inhibited?
from
Deb and Nick
The question about the difference between sensory integration and reflex integration and inhibition is one that I too have been pondering since this discussion started. I'm hoping that Claire and others can give us the benefit of their wisdom on that one!